My plan was, to trade in my 80-200mm f/2.8 in order to raise some cash which, combined with some savings of my own would allow me to buy the 85mm f/1.8 as a portrait lens and the 35mm f/2 as a quasi normal lens, also useful for full body portraits.
Of course, I consulted my mentor ~eduardofrench who, slightly to my surprise, agreed that this was a good idea. I have become used to being told that my grand schemes are reactionary and juvenile. So, I spent the next day planning a journey, and the day following that on the journey to and from the camera shop [link] . Unfortunately, the 85mm f/1.8 was not in stock, but they were kind enough to post it special delivery as soon as it arrived for no extra charge. This is the sort of reason that I go to the opposite end of the neighbouring county to do my camera shopping. This was on Monday, the lens was posted on Tuesday and so was at my door on Wednesday. Unfortunately, I was asleep after a late night and my dad missed the postman. So I had to wait until today so that I could collect it from the post office!
It was more than worth the effort, both lenses are excellent and I'm eager to get shooting properly. Results up here when the following criteria are met:
- I can be bothered to arrange taking picture
- I actually am bothered to take pictures
- I produce something I deem to be acceptable










[link]
Come'on.. my 90mm is ready for anything you throw at it.
Well, lets look at some standardised results:
[link] Tamron 90mm (Di, but whatever)
[link] Nikon 50mm f/1.8
The thing is, all digital photos need a bit of sharpening. If you are shooting jpg it is done automatically, but if you shoot raw you then have the ability to choose whichever sharpening method you wish. Shooting with different cameras makes it hard for us to compare lenses.
Anyway, I was just joking, looking from that review the lens looks great. The length would make using it a lot more like using Nikons 105mm, but of course at a fraction of the price. I've always thought that the 60mm macro offered by Nikon would be too short for many things.
It's not like I take my lens serious to begin with. I picked it up for $200.
For that price the optical quality is pretty awesome.
We rarely find ourselves in ideal conditions, but we just have to make the most of it. For example, when I was shooting those landscapes I was at a disadvantage as I had no graduated neutral density filters. However, by shooting with the sun behind me I was able to capture information in the sky and the landscape. Just enough so that in post production I could play with the levels and blue saturation to get a blue sky in, and some contrast in one the land.
--
I'll see you ... out there.
I wanted to thank you for the recent
--
"Music is a moral law. It gives soul to the universe, wings to the mind, flight to the imagination, and charm and gaiety to life and to everything. "
Previous Page12345...Next Page